Under review means the application is being viewed by hiring manager. If you're following an informal report format you could structure your report in three sections: summary, major issues, minor issues. It is also important at this stage to declare any potential Conflict of Interest. In general, 15-60 days is quite normal. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. Share your stories! . 'Under Consideration' job status means that your application is being reviewed by HR. This appears to be a Nature journal. Drawing a conclusion that is contradicted by the author's own statistical or qualitative evidence, Ignoring a process that is known to have a strong influence on the area under study, The sufficient use of control experiments, The regularity of sampling in time-dependent studies, The validity of questions, the use of a detailed methodology and the data analysis being done systematically (in qualitative research), That qualitative research extends beyond the author's opinions, with sufficient descriptive elements and appropriate quotes from interviews or focus groups, Contradictory data that either are not self-consistent or disagree with the conclusions, Confirmatory data that adds little, if anything, to current understanding - unless strong arguments for such repetition are made, Help the editor properly contextualize the research and add weight to your judgement, Show the author what key messages are conveyed to the reader, so they can be sure they are achieving what they set out to do, Focus on successful aspects of the paper so the author gets a sense of what they've done well. If a manuscript only uses half the citations typical in its field, this may be an indicator that referencing should be improved - but don't be guided solely by quantity, References should be relevant, recent and readily retrievable, Gives due recognition to the initial discoveries and related work that led to the work under assessment. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. [CDATA[// > The chances of. The Clinical Teacher is committed to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct. Supplementing with Prof. Mohammad Jakir Hosen. If there are formal guidelines, let them direct the structure of your review. A study on the rooting of O. lanceolata stem cuttings was conducted using a low-cost technology employed in commercial rooting stem cuttings of tea . Judging fit for purpose includes consideration of the AOP and associated . Phd at snhu 2 . May-June 2022. . Your question regarding the editorial office is not very clear to me and I assume two editorial offices were mentioned in the submission system. Work with existing files: Easily upload from and export to your favorite file formatManuscripts converts the files accurately and instantly. In this pandemic situation, it's highly likely that the processing time will delay a bit longer than normal. on 29 Oct, 2015, Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic requirements of the journal. After the detailed read-through, you will be in a position to advise whether the title, abstract and key words are optimized for search purposes. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Editors say, "If a reviewer suggests a rejection, but her/his comments are not detailed or helpful, it does not help the editor in making a decision.". This point is only valid if researchers can point to recent developments in data gathering techniques or to research in indirectly related fields that suggest the topic needs revisiting. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Most editors have access to software that can check for plagiarism. When preparing a manuscript, authors should refer to a recent issue of the Journal and follow the detailed instructions given below. Our policy on posting, licensing, citation of preprints and communications with the media about preprints of primary research manuscripts is summarized below. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection with the possibility of resubmission this is most relevant where substantial, major revision is necessary. AAMs should not include other publisher value-added contributions, however, such as formatting, pagination, and copyediting. You may be asked to revise your manuscript slightly or to perform a . ]]> It has been like that for a few days without any email notification. I dont know my answer satisfied you or not. Manuscript preparation and submission . If unprocessed data are unavailable, manuscript evaluation may be stalled until the issue is . Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. Manuscript Submission Child Development invites for consideration manuscripts that are neither identical to nor substantially similar to work published or under review elsewhere. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Either way, this is usually a good sign if it is at Nature itself. I did not receive any intimation from the editorial office about my manuscript not meeting the journal's guidelines.